Personality? What personality?

Some of my favour­ite — er, as in least favour­ite — moments in life have come to pass when online per­son­al­ity tests have sucked me into their mali­cious, soul-destroying clutches, only to con­firm that there was ulti­mately no need to waste ten pre­cious minutes of my exist­ence to be told some­thing about myself that I already knew per­fectly well, thank you very much.

Sigh. Or Sign, as all the fash­ion­able folk are say­ing these days.

As doomed romantics go, then, I am appar­ently a Neur­otic Shambles.

And the Pope is most def­in­itely not a Muslim.

Comments: 7

    you are not a shambles

    andre | 12.13.06, 01:18

    We can talk about that another day — you have been through enough.

    andre | 12.13.06, 12:21

    Ah, that one’s crap — it said I was Hugh Grant! What have I got in com­mon with Hugh Grant? And what kind of psy­cho­met­ric assess­ment is that; Hugh Grant is not a personality-type?

    Try this one: http://www.seductiveshorts.com/#goods/quiz

    It reckoned that I was a Lib­ertine. Now, I’m not a lib­ertine, not in the slight­est. In fact, I am so not a lib­ertine, I found the sug­ges­tion quite flattering.

    The Goldfish | 12.13.06, 12:22

    The only per­son­al­ity type traits I can think of for Hugh Grant are, in no par­tic­u­lar order of favour­it­ism: floppy fringe, irrit­at­ingly Eng­lish, goes with pros­ti­tutes. I agree, that is noe a per­son­al­ity type. Take the test again, my dearest Gold­fish, and please lie through your teeth this time. Be a neur­otic shambles like me. All the best people are. Apparently.

    An Unreliable Witness | 12.13.06, 13:22

    Appar­ently I exist to be in love. I’m a Wraith. The prob­lem is me.

    WTF??

    And yes, that anal sex ques­tion threw me as well..

    Gordon | 12.14.06, 14:03

    I wasn’t chuffed to be a Wraith but I feel bet­ter now I’m also a Tan­tric Master.

    Fussy Bitch | 12.14.06, 16:07

Leave a comment