(Ad)mission statement

Angry clouds, pictured yesterdayI am on a mis­sion to be awk­ward. You will not like this mis­sion. Indeed, you will prob­ably end up dis­lik­ing me intensely, and will want to call me needy and demand­ing and self-centred and selfish and everything else under the sun, some of which may involve gra­tu­it­ous amounts of swearing.

But I don’t care. I am being com­pletely and thor­oughly and unreas­on­ably unreas­on­able, and I am going to enjoy it. Growl.

It is Tues­day, and I am feel­ing monu­ment­ally dis­sat­is­fied. With you. With life. Even with cheese and Vegem­ite on toast. And cheese and Vegem­ite on toast is my favour­ite new snack of the moment. The snack du jour, if you will. Cheese and Vegem­ite on toast has not done any­thing to me except be deli­cious, and yet I am hor­ribly dis­sat­is­fied with it. Please for­give me, my mouth­wa­ter­ing snack­ette. For­give me for ever doubt­ing you.

How­ever, although I am dis­sat­is­fied with every­one and everything else, I can’t bring myself to call any of you any­thing rude. Not like I can when address­ing, for instance, the entire Cath­olic church today. I could call them a very rude word. A very rude word indeed. And what’s more, it would be aes­thet­ic­ally pleas­ing because it would allit­er­ate. You big­oted bunch of Cath­olic, er, cat­er­waulers. Yes, cat­er­waulers, that’s the word I wasn’t look­ing for.

The Cardinal: he's been fingeredCar­dinal Cor­mac Murphy O’Connor, I am offi­cially giv­ing you the fin­ger. I am giv­ing you the fin­ger and an angry, with­er­ing look besides. You’re scared, aren’t you? If I say enough nasty things about you, the entire UK blog­ging move­ment will fol­low my lead and will rise up as one against you to put you at the top of the Google rank­ings for the phrase “Cath­olic toss­pot”. I am that influ­en­tial, you know. I’ve writ­ten to every A-list blog­ger out there (and I do know a few, believe me, because some­times they even talk to little old me) and asked them to do it. The guer­rilla cam­paign of Brit­ish blog­ger petu­lance starts here. Be afraid, Cor­mac. Be very afraid.

Hello, and wel­come to An Unre­li­able Wit­ness, the home of incis­ive polit­ical and social com­ment. Come in, make your­self at home, and wipe your feet on the big­oted doormat as you enter.

None of this applies to you, though. You’re lovely. Ish. I won’t call you any­thing rude. Rude-ish, any­way. For you, I will just growl and look vaguely men­acing — an expres­sion that you will prob­ably mis­in­ter­pret as trapped wind. And then I will go and do that selfish, awk­ward thing to which I referred at the start of this point­less post. How much do you hate me right now, on a scale of, say, one to six hun­dred and seventy-three point six recurring?

Yes, I thought so. That much. You can be quite impress­ive when you want to be, can’t you? But not as impress­ive as I can be when I’m growl­ing and being ridicu­lously petty and moody and suchlike.

If you don’t like this post — which is per­fectly under­stand­able, frankly — might I sug­gest that you go and read some­thing else? Like a com­ic­ally cor­rup­ted credit card state­ment or an entry that men­tions sex a lot? Ah, see, now I’ve reached your level of interest. I knew it.

More of this stuff soon. Prob­ably. When I’ve stopped sulk­ing and act­ing like a big drama queen. And when that Car­dinal Cor­mac Murphy O’Connor has finally tired of call­ing me up and ask­ing if I want to take this out­side to the car park and have it out like real men. Oi, Cor­mac! Shut it! There.

I think that’s my taxi to hell outside.

Comments: 9

    Such obscen­ity only goes to show how it is impossible for you people to con­fine your depraved baby-eating shenanigans to behind closed doors in the sub­urbs of Gomor­rah, you have to go and “give the fin­ger” to our beloved Car­dinal — which we all know is a thinly-veiled euphem­ism for an act so vile and unnat­ural that I can hardly bear to spend more than an hour think­ing about it!

    Of course I love you as a brother and I fully sup­port your right not to be impaled on a red hot poker — good­ness knows you’ll have plenty of that later on. But where is this going to end? If we allow people to love one another willy-nilly, if we allow chil­dren to be loved by people who love one another regard­less of whether their private parts are match­ing or con­trast­ing, if we cel­eb­rate love as a gift from God in all its won­drous vari­ety, then we would have no choice but to con­sider the real causes of sor­row and unhap­pi­ness in the world and what we might do about them.

    Tra­gic­ally, many of our Cath­olic brethren have become totally pre­oc­cu­pied by those things and have no quar­rel with you — or else they fall into the trap of think­ing that the sins of the flesh are a mat­ter of some tri­vi­al­ity next to poverty, war, fam­ine, injustice or the needs of a child who needs a lov­ing home.

    But those things are so much more com­plic­ated, and need real work, thought and com­pas­sion to solve. It is so much easier mak­ing a fuss about the queers.

    Sister Augustus the Hippo | 01.23.07, 14:37

    Ohh that’s genius!!

    LOVE the fake com­menter, nice touch there.

    Or should I just roll my eyes at yet another reli­gious nut­ter who believes a work of fiction.

    YOU DECIDE.

    P.S. Does the word you were look­ing for being with a c? And end in –unts?

    Gordon | 01.23.07, 19:28

    But aren’t arch­bish­ops also known as prim­ates and aren’t prim­ates actu­ally mon­keys. Enough said methinks…

    I dread to think what the taxi fare to hell would cost.

    Random Reflections | 01.23.07, 22:50

    you are going to go straight to hell for this!

    andre | 01.23.07, 23:53

    Save me a seat, please.

    Fussy Bitch | 01.24.07, 14:03

    I am confused.

    I don’t under­stand why we are sup­posed to hate you? Is it because you hate a homo­phobic bigot? Eh?

    Still con­fused.

    Clare | 01.26.07, 07:46

    Sorry, I’m hav­ing link issues.
    It’s Mark Mor­ford, “Gay Mar­riage Is Still Evil? Because the funny thing is, des­pite all the frantic state bans, no one can really say why…”

    Lady Miss Marquise | 01.26.07, 23:26

    Why can’t we all just turn our backs on this bunch of out­dated, close-minded, stuck-in-their-ways closet pae­do­philes? I grew up in a Cath­olic coun­try (Brazil) and had all their crap rammed down my throat for years. In my humble opin­ion, Cath­oli­cism is the reason South Amer­ica doesn’t move for­ward. We have an AIDS epi­demic yet, ‘no, no… God says you mustn’t wear con­doms’. Sorry I can’t express my dis­sat­is­fac­tion with the same elo­quence as you can, but they bring out the beast in me! Sorry, I AM a very tol­er­ant per­son. Honest.

    Marcos | 01.27.07, 00:33

Leave a comment