Comments on: Old Red Nose is back http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/ Frequently pretentious since 1971. Clearly ambiguous since 2000. Completely and utterly incomprehensible since 2006. Warning: may contain synonyms. Sun, 06 Jun 2010 08:29:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Mr Farty http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-624 Mr Farty Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:32:59 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-624 Oops, think I took a wrong turning on t'internet. I was looking for sexual perversions with kittens... *clicks out* Oops, think I took a wrong turning on t’internet. I was looking for sexual perversions with kittens…

*clicks out*

]]> By: peterandthehare http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-623 peterandthehare Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:07:31 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-623 it is the duty of our generation to expose the myth that clwns are funny. well done. (PS: I skim-read a lot of this to be honest, but I've no reason to suspect that its not all excellent. Blame the 21st century.) it is the duty of our generation to expose the myth that clwns are funny. well done. (PS: I skim-read a lot of this to be honest, but I’ve no reason to suspect that its not all excellent. Blame the 21st century.)

]]> By: andre http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-622 andre Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:07:10 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-622 I think it is the perfect length. So to speak. If it ain't broke don't fix it. I think it is the perfect length. So to speak.

If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

]]> By: Clare http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-621 Clare Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:21:55 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-621 This is indeed brilliant, and will make a great foreword. But may I suggest that it might be a mite long? A little judicious editing, maybe? Sorry. I have been doing a lot of editing of my own stuff lately. I am in Editing Mode. This is indeed brilliant, and will make a great foreword.

But may I suggest that it might be a mite long? A little judicious editing, maybe?

Sorry. I have been doing a lot of editing of my own stuff lately. I am in Editing Mode.

]]> By: Morgan http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-620 Morgan Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:18:13 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-620 Since marrying an American, I now understand what true boozy freaks us Brits are. We are a mutant race, but lovely with it. I thought about submitting something to the blonkilation book, but I'm never very funny - just confused, erratic or brain-damaged. I'd just be embarrassing myself. Since marrying an American, I now understand what true boozy freaks us Brits are. We are a mutant race, but lovely with it.

I thought about submitting something to the blonkilation book, but I’m never very funny — just confused, erratic or brain-damaged. I’d just be embarrassing myself.

]]> By: Pete http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-619 Pete Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:16:45 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-619 I, too, am using a post from July 2003 as my submission. It must have been a good year. I, too, am using a post from July 2003 as my submission.

It must have been a good year.

]]> By: Fussy Bitch http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Fussy Bitch Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:02:38 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-618 Papping Santa wasn't very funny, he deserves his downtime. Papping Santa wasn’t very funny, he deserves his downtime.

]]> By: lucy p http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-617 lucy p Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:18:58 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-617 or preface. or something. or preface. or something.

]]> By: lucy p http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-616 lucy p Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:18:43 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-616 effing cripes, this should be the foreword! effing cripes, this should be the foreword!

]]> By: mike http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615 mike Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:39:36 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-615 I am currently residing in a small, but ever-widening, pool of Mirth. It was that Lulu that tipped me over. Gay man + Lulu = FUNNY. It's an age-old equation. I am currently residing in a small, but ever-widening, pool of Mirth.

It was that Lulu that tipped me over. Gay man + Lulu = FUNNY. It’s an age-old equation.

]]> By: Ariel http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-614 Ariel Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:46:20 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-614 I am agog at such masterful verbosity, such pizazz, such elegance! But why oh why bring Jim Davidson in? Eeeeeeeeeeeek. I am agog at such masterful verbosity, such pizazz, such elegance! But why oh why bring Jim Davidson in? Eeeeeeeeeeeek.

]]> By: Hg http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-613 Hg Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:01:33 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-613 <i>"I have realised, with a growing sense of alarm, that I am probably going to have to delve as far back as 2003 in my archives in order to find a suitable post for this collection that could even be considered remotely ‘funny’. Oh dear."</i> Yeah, my submission is from four years ago too. I'm trying not to think about the implications of that. “I have realised, with a growing sense of alarm, that I am probably going to have to delve as far back as 2003 in my archives in order to find a suitable post for this collection that could even be considered remotely ‘funny’. Oh dear.”

Yeah, my submission is from four years ago too. I’m trying not to think about the implications of that.

]]> By: The Goldfish http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-612 The Goldfish Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:50:36 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-612 As unofficial archivist, I should inform you that your critical appreciation of the Revenge of the Sith was bladder-challenging and was only published the summer before last. In fact, if you have any trouble, I can think of a few later than 2003. As unofficial archivist, I should inform you that your critical appreciation of the Revenge of the Sith was bladder-challenging and was only published the summer before last. In fact, if you have any trouble, I can think of a few later than 2003.

]]> By: Jack http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Jack Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:09:25 +0000 http://www.unreliablewitness.com/2007/03/09/old-red-nose-is-back/#comment-611 Easily the best post on this subject so far and you didn't even have to resort to talking about your underwear. Well done that man. Easily the best post on this subject so far and you didn’t even have to resort to talking about your underwear. Well done that man.

]]>