How to abandon a USP, in one easy lesson

Look closely, and you might notice something different.

If you arrived at this URL expecting to find this site’s usual front page containing links to three blogs - Writing, Scribbling and Engaging - then your eyes are not deceiving you. An Unreliable Witness is now just one blog. How very mainstream and traditional of me.

Why? Oh, because.

The three blog format was my Unique Selling Point. My Big Idea. A big idea but, as it turned out and as I’m now prepared to admit, a rather impractical one. I accept defeat. It didn’t quite work. Some parts got updated more than others. I sometimes didn’t know which section was most appropriate for a particular entry. So the big idea is no more. I have killed it. Or rather them. The three blogs, that is. Sorry about that. Oh, don’t cry. It’s really not worth getting upset about. It’s only a website.

All the content has now been moved into the interminable mish-mash of entries that you can see here, featuring miscellaneous life events, post-it notes, unsent letters, musical thoughts, dream plays and other ideas that come into my diseased mind at inopportune moments.

Questions? Yes, you must have them.

First: what does this mean for you, the visiting reader skimming your way through your daily intake of frequently-updated personal websites?

Well, I think you should probably prepare yourself to put up with a certain degree of eclecticism. If, for instance, you only ever visited one of the three blogs because you didn’t like those weird stories about Jesus riding a bicycle through my flat or didn’t rate my taste in music and literature, then I can only offer my sincerest apologies that you’re going to have to grit your teeth and endure all those kinds of entries in future. Here. In one place.

Second, if you were kind enough to link to one particular section of An Unreliable Witness in the past, I would be grateful if you could change the web address to point to the much sleeker and snappier URL of www.unreliablewitness.com. And if you’re one of those fashionable people who browse blogs via feeds of one sort or other, you’ll need to update your feedreader of choice. Details can be found in the menu to your right - under ‘Feeds’, funnily enough.

So, welcome to the all new An Unreliable Witness, featuring the same old meaningless verbosity but in one convenient location. Hmm, I’m going to have to work on crafting that into a rather more appealing strapline.

Up until now, even if you couldn’t think of anything memorable about An Unreliable Witness, you could at least say that it was three blogs in one. That’s gone, I’m afraid. Gone and forgotten. However, if you can think of something new and equally memorable to say about this site, do please let me know. After all, a Unique Selling Point is so important these days, wouldn’t you agree?

As you were, then.

Comments: 29

    I prefer it like this. straightforward and no faffing about.

    your unique selling point is your writing, which, in my opinion, is fantastic.

    Marcos | 03.19.07, 21:11

    Thank goodness you came to your senses. Three in one is the new blog.

    Cosi Fan Tutte | 03.19.07, 22:58

    So the Trinity resolves into Unity.

    Could be theology.

    Or bicycle oil.

    robin | 03.19.07, 23:29

    To be honest, I don’t care if it’s one blog, three blogs or seventeen blogs, as long as it has your writing (which it does).

    Marcos is right, your unique ‘selling point’ (though I don’t know why a blog needs a ‘selling point’) is your marvellous writing and wonderful thoughts. So there.

    Little Lead Pencil | 03.20.07, 05:35

    Three-in-one, one-in-one, a multitude-in-one, it doesn’t matter all that much. And I have no complaints about eclecticism here. I am madly in love with your writing and if I could have babies with it, I would.

    Lizza | 03.20.07, 06:08

    An Unreliable Witness: because less is more

    andre | 03.20.07, 11:57

    Well, it’s probably for the best. It was a fun experiment while it lasted though.

    Pete | 03.20.07, 12:25

    It’s perfect!

    Annie | 03.20.07, 12:42

    I don’t know, next week it’ll be all extolling the virtues of Notepad and “I code all this by hand, you know!”

    Jack | 03.20.07, 14:36

    Take three blogs into the shower? Not me, I just wash and go with the Unreliable Witness.”

    Tried to replace the word wash with something which rhymes but could only come up with slosh (?), go posh, read tosh (!) or say “Gosh!”.

    The Goldfish | 03.20.07, 16:56

    Thank you all for your kind words. Anyone who does feel cheated by being offered less blogs than they were originally promised can, of course, claim their money back.

    I will never proudly proclaim that I code everything by hand using Notepad. Mainly because I want websites and blogging to be even more automated - right down to writing the entries, in fact.

    And Goldfish? It occurs to me that the word “wash” could have been replaced with “toss”. But then only someone with my filthy mind could possibly suggest that “I just toss and go with the Unreliable Witness”.

    An Unreliable Witness | 03.20.07, 17:27

    Well done - very sleek! Glad you still have the smart little red strips at the top, & I’m thinking of the New Eclecticism as an opportunity to read bits I might have missed before…

    Ms Baroque | 03.20.07, 18:58

    Hmm, I think for that you’d need to use much filthier language and post more pictures, more explicit pictures of tinned food products, and give us profiles for them like “Value Baked Beans, 19 wks from Tesco, likes to be warmed up on a gentle heat, given a quick stir and served on toast.”

    The Goldfish | 03.20.07, 18:59

    Thank fuck.

    Gordon | 03.20.07, 23:09

    ;-)

    Gordon | 03.20.07, 23:10

    (was worried you might take a fence)

    Gordon | 03.20.07, 23:10

    And only the other day did I setup a triple-blog-style feed of my three sites, all in your honour, as I thought yours was such a good idea. Plus I thought you might need a bit of company, seeing as you were the tri-blog pioneer.

    Then you go and change, and I am left all alone.

    I’m now somewhat jaded.

    Timbo | 03.21.07, 01:10

    Timbo, try not to think of it so much as me leaving you all alone in the world of tri-blogging, but instead that I am passing on the mantle to you. Go forth and prosper. Or something.

    An Unreliable Witness | 03.21.07, 01:29

    Cor, so three into one does go with no remainders!

    I think your new USP could be if you wiggle a mouse over your banner it looks a bit like a barbers pole on it’s side.

    Angela M | 03.21.07, 12:11

    i luv u Dawn!!!!

    Kafka | 03.21.07, 18:39

    In my opinion, this is Better. There can be no dissent.

    Well, there could be, but there shouldn’t be.

    Katy Newton | 03.21.07, 21:22

    22nd!!!

    andre | 03.21.07, 21:23

    23rd!!!

    Mind you, I’ll have you know that I once received 57 comments. Yes, 57! Though I did have to saw half of my left leg off to achieve such a feat. It seemed like a small price to pay.

    An Unreliable Witness | 03.21.07, 21:46

    the things we do for our public

    andre | 03.22.07, 15:46

    I’m with the majority.

    Although I’ll continue to read you even if you turn your blog into a mysterious labryinth of ‘secret egg’ links and invisible type - this does make it a hell of a lot easier to enjoy.

    In that wholesome, Buddhist way. :)

    Morgan | 03.22.07, 15:48

    Hell. With reference to comment 23, I’ve just realised that it was the right leg. The right. Right?

    Easy mistake to make. Right leg. Left leg. So confusing.

    An Unreliable Witness | 03.22.07, 16:07

    Did you check to see which leg it was in the mirror and then get a bit confused?

    andre | 03.22.07, 16:44

    A lot easier. It was always worth the effort, but effort it was.

    looby | 03.26.07, 09:28

    I’ve worked it out now. Some of use are just slow. Hell’s bells, how embarrassing, though it took a little less time than changing Andre’s url did? :)

    And the Christ on a bike entry remains my favourite, for some reason.

    Cheerful One | 04.10.07, 18:54

Leave a comment