Fame, fame, fatal fame
Ever since the first series began, I’ve been trying to adequately explain to people why I loathe Big Brother with a passion. I’ve never quite managed it, instead burbling all sorts of random arguments about how it’s not realistic as a social experiment, or about how it is an unfortunate sign of our society that instead of following the lives of ourselves and our friends and family with such interest, we instead make an appointment to view people we don’t know interacting in a completely false situation. Oh, and not forgetting that most of the people featured are borderline obnoxious. Not surprisingly, people aren’t very convinced. I don’t blame them. These days, the programme is so popular and so ubiquitous, that I just tend to keep quiet.
Anyway, just in case I’m sounding like a killjoy, I can fully appreciate that the series is entertaining, voyeuristic, titillating, prime material for scandalous gossip — and I’ll fully admit that having never watched a single full episode previously, during this series I have been suckered in to watching two whole programmes. For your information — yes, I would like Brian to win.
However, in a column written just after some person called Narinder (who, frankly, sounds thoroughly unpleasant) was evicted from the house, the superb political commentator and comedian Mark Steel, as always, hit the nail right on the head. It’s all about fame. We’re obsessed with it. I tend to think that, even more than the £70,000 which the contestants in Big Brother could win, it’s the fame which encouraged them to apply. Yet what are they going to be famous for? Er, well, nothing. Living in a house for nine weeks, and that’s it:
“Fame for its own sake has become such a dominant part of our culture. A celeb’s success is deemed to be in line with how well known they are, although the best known are almost certain to be people who’ve done nothing of any value.”
It’s a disease of our modern, celebrity culture — and I hadn’t realised, until now, how much I hate it. I’m not against fame or celebrity if the person involved has actually done something, or achieved something using their skills and talents. But to thirst after popularity and success for doing precisely nothing of any real merit — whether it’s living in a house for nine weeks with a bunch of other hideous misfits, being a learner-driver on some reality TV programme, or being a friend of somebody well-known and managing to push your way into the public eye via their notoriety — seems like the complete nadir of our obsession with fame.
I can recall a time when being a celebrity actually meant something. Today, your milkman could be on the front page of The Sun, and he probably is.