Hello little girl
I loved Alice in Wonderland and Alice Through the Looking-Glass when I was a child. I had wonderful old copies of each, with covers that resembled marble. Inside, the books were filled with the most beautiful pictures, painted in colours that made them almost leap out from the page. The volumes were published in the early part of the last century, and had been passed down through my mother’s side of the family. They were originally a present to my great-grandmother in 1903 — the front page of each book had the original messages to her, written in verse by her father. It seems that he imagined himself to be a bit of a poet — a trait that seems to exist in our family to this day, in case you hadn’t noticed.
From about eight years old, I became captivated by these magical tales. I spent many hours drawing huge pictures of scenes from the books, applying my vivid imagination to characterisations of Alice, the Cheshire Cat, the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter in particular.
Of course, with growing up comes the loss of childhood innocence. I was shattered when I began to learn that Alice’s adventures may have had something to do with Lewis Carroll’s own fascination with Alice Liddell, the seven-year-old girl to whom he read his stories. I put the books back on the “family” bookshelves, rather than the bookcase in my own bedroom, and forgot about them.
About five years ago, I went through a phase of trying to ‘reclaim’ certain books — books that, at one time or another, I had loved, but had since been spoilt for me in various ways. Usually, this was because of over-analysis by English teachers during my years at school. They would claim to be able to explain the reasoning behind every single sentence, including the motivation of the author and what they had for breakfast on the day they wrote a particular chapter.
In some cases, reacquainting myself with the books actually worked — separated from the droning voice of sixth-form tutor Mrs Mullett (yes, that was her real name), Thomas Hardy’s Jude the Obscure was once again revealed as a tragic and emotionally disturbing story. But the Alice books were beyond me. As much as I loved the personal history contained in the volumes — touching the worn pages and gazing at the beautiful images — I couldn’t rid myself of the unpleasant facts about Lewis Carroll.
Katie Roiphe, writing in The Guardian, tries to put an objective and thoroughly modern spin on the background to Carroll’s obsession:
“To me, there is a nobility in a self-restraint so forceful that it spews out stuttering tortoises and talking chess pieces rather than focus on the matter at hand. There is something touching about a man who fights the hardest fight in the world: his own desire. You can feel the loneliness on the page. You can the feel the longing in the photographs. You can witness the self-contempt in his diaries. How can one not feel sympathy for a man who writes in his diary, ‘I pray to God to give me a new heart’, but is stuck, in spite of his astonishing powers of invention, his brilliance, his immortal wit, with the one he has.”
I don’t know. Somehow, the harsh reality of our society no longer allows me to see things in this way. My mind is too full of the disturbing images and stories we see and read in the news. Why can’t I think in the same way as Katie Roiphe does about a friendship between a middle-aged vicar and a sweet seven-year-old girl? Does the real world have to change the way in which we think about fantasy, as well as everything else?
For now, I’m afraid the Alice volumes will be staying on the family bookshelves.